Despite several appreciable
initiatives by Government of Rajasthan for consumer welfare,
like ‘Sudh Ke Liye Yudh’, mobile laboratories to check quality
of food items, food grain schemes etc the situation of the
grassroots consumers have not changed much. Only 26 % cases
are disposed within the prescribed by District Fora, 60%
districts have the drug inspectors and most of the district
consumer protection councils are not active. It was revealed
during the research carried out by CUTS International in 12
districts of Rajasthan, namely Tonk, Chittorgarh, Kota, Bundi,
Alwar, Banswara, Jodhpur, Jalore, Churu, Sikar, Dholpur and
Dausa under the “Grassroots Reachout & Networking in Rajasthan
through Consumer Action” (GRANIRCA) project supported by
Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Government of India.
The problem of adulterated and
sub-standard food items is the first and foremost concern of
the consumers. There is considerable increase in sample taken
of food items by the health department but is surprising that
only 14% of samples taken were found adulterated. The proper
and timely analysis of samples is crucial for punishing the
offenders but delay and lurch in lab analysis and taking legal
action is helping the offenders to defy the law.
After falling ill due to
adulterated and sub-standard food items, any person takes
medicines in hope of recovery but the situation hare is worse.
The system of controlling spurious drugs and medicines is very
weak. Only 60% districts have the drug inspectors at district
level and those are given charge of 2 or 3 districts. The
number of samples of drugs taken by inspectors is very few,
which shows that they are not taking adequate steps to
accomplish their duties. Even in case of failed samples they
have not taken stern action against the drug vendors.
Rajasthan has only one lab for testing of drugs at Jaipur. The
working of drug inspectors is not transparent and many of them
denied providing the required information.
The plight of consumers not ends
here, apart from the quality of products the consumer are also
cheated in quantity at many place like patrol pumps, mandies,
grocery shop, sweet shop, milkman etc. But the district
weights & measures (Legal Metrology) inspectors, responsible
to ensure the accuracy of weights and measures, as well as
standard of packaged commodities are not taking proactive
steps to check this and to punish the offenders. Only 65
complaints received by them, shows that general public is not
aware about their role, work and functions. In Rajasthan there
is no separate legal metrology department but the Industrial
Department is given extra responsibility to look after these
issues, which is also responsible for poor performance of the
department.
The Targeted Public Distribution
System (TPDS) is the life line for poor consumers but more
than 652 complaints were received by District Supply Officers
(DSOs) related to PDS dealers. Similarly 206 complaints were
received against Gas Agencies. DSOs responsible for
coordination among various departments working for consumer
protection at district level should be more proactive to
address all these issues.
After failing to get relief from
these departments, a consumer is left with option to approach
District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum (District Forum) to
seek justice. But there also he will get disappointments. Out
of 12 only 7 District Forum are having required 3 members, 4
are working with 2 members and District Forum at Sikar is
defunct, having no member. It is also an irony that less than
3% consumer complaints are directly filed by consumers
themselves, without engaging any advocate. Even if any
consumer approaches District Forum, it is bound to be delayed
in getting justice as only 26 % cases are disposed within the
prescribed period under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
There is a need of holistic view
to promote consumer welfare not only limiting to grievance
redressal. The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has envisaged a
well-thought design of Consumer Protection Councils, from
national to district level to promote and protect the rights
of the consumers. These councils have miserably failed in
their mandates and during the research it came out that in
most of the districts these councils are either not
established or have not come out of paper. Central and State
Governments are announcing various schemes like consumer clubs
in education institutes, financial assistance to consumer
organisations and consumers to fight cases, awards for
consumer activists etc. 335 consumer clubs have been
established in 12 districts but no financial assistance was
provided to them, only in 2 districts awards were given to
consumer activists and in 4 districts consumer were provided
financial support.
With all these hollow initiatives
the promotion and protection of consumer interests will remain
only a wish statement in the state. So there is urgent need to
address all these issues so that consumers’ welfare in
Rajasthan can be ensured.
For more
information please contact:
Amarjeet Singh (+91-9829015812) / Deepak Saxena (+91-
9351366827)
CUTS Center for Consumer Action, Research & Training (CUTS-
CART)
D-222, Bhaskar Marg, Bani Park Jaipur 302 016, India
Ph: 91.141.5133259, 2282 823/2282 482
Fax: 91.141. 4015395
Email:
as7@cuts.org;
granirca@cuts.org
Project webpage:
www.cuts-international.org/cart/GRANIRCA
Please
Note:
The data of were collected of year 2008 and 2009, except the
appointments in District Forum.