INVESTMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT (IFD Project)

CUTS>CITEE>IFD Project>Country Reports and Papers>Country Reports: Index
Home
About CUTS
CITEE
CART
CHD
C-SPAC
C-CIER
Contact CUTS
 

 

About IFD Project

Operational Strategy Note

Event Reports
IFD Launch Meting (13-14 Dec 2001)

Ist Partner Meeting (12th Dec2001)
Project Advisory Committee Meeting
PAC-I (15th Dec 2001)
PAC-II (22nd Jan 2002)

TOR Advocacy Document

NRG Meeting 1st
India
Tanzania

Hungary
South Africa

Bangladesh

Zambia

Brazil  

NRG Meeting 2nd

South Africa
India

Brazil

Hungary
Bangladesh

Tanzania

NRG Meeting 3rd

South Africa
India

Bangladesh

Tanzania

 

Progress Report
First Quarter
Second Quarter

Third Quarter

Fourth Quarter

Fifth Quarter

 

Country Reports

Papers and PowerPoint Presentations

Periodicals

Newsletters

Investment for Development

E-Newsletters

IFD E-News

 PROJECTS

Investment for Development (IFD)

7 Up

Campaign on Linkages

SACSNITI

FEATS

 Investment for Development

Country Reports 

The researchers of the selected seven countries have prepared country research reports on investment regimes of their respective countries. The terms of references (TORs) of these reports and the latest versions of the reports are available in the website.

Assessment of investment policies in  

Terms of Reference  
 
Report A: Investment Policy  
                        
             


This report will constitute a study of the national investment policies of the selected country

Input: This report should draw on secondary sources

Output: A reader-friendly, non-technical document, for distribution to stakeholders and to set the scene for the deeper research in Report B, in particular helping to identify case studies.

1.       Brief overview of macroeconomic context for the last 10 years

  •          Market size and growth rate

  •          Macro stability (inflation, interest rates etc

  •          Infrastructure

  •          Technology and skill levels

  •          Investment flows (domestic and foreign; inward and outward; greenfield and M&A; country of 
       origin or destination; sector-wise breakdown)

  •          Capital and current accounts balance,  etc.

2.       Overview of main policy trends for the last 10+ years

  •          Parameters/priorities of the national development strategy/poverty reduction strategy

  •          Trade policy including any regional trade arrangements, membership of the WTO

  •          Capital controls

  •          Privatisation/regulation

  •          Broad parameters of competition law, labour and environmental regulation

  •          Fiscal regime for foreign investors and their investments

  •          Intellectual property rights regime

3.       Investment Policy Audit

For all policies, report should specify when the measure was introduced, whether there is any difference in the treatment of national and foreign investors; differences across sectors etc.

  •        Registration: What is the process for registering a foreign investment? Have any efforts been 
     made to streamline this process? How are foreign investors and investments defined for the 
     purposes of registration?

  •        Rights to entry and establishment: Limits on type of investment (portfolio v. direct), size of 
     holdings, extent of ownership, JV requirement, sector-wise restrictions etc.

  •        Investor protection, guarantees (e.g rates of return), insurance provisions

  •        Dispute settlement mechanisms

  •        Restrictions on outward capital flows (repatriation of profits etc)

  •        Bilateral/regional agreements on investment, transfer pricing, double taxation treaties

  •        Investment facilitation institutions/initiatives

  •        Incentives (e.g. reduced income tax rates; tax holidays; exemptions from import duties/duty   
     drawbacks; accelerated depreciation rates; investment allowances; specific deductions from 
     gross earnings for income-tax; deductions from social security contributions; grants; loans and  
     loan guarantees. Are these targeted? Rules-based incentives such as labour or environmental 
     standards etc.)

  •        Requirements (e.g. local content requirements; export requirements/limitation; import 
     balancing/limitation; foreign exchange limitation etc.)

4.       Policy-making process for investment issues.

This section should be more discursive, highlighting problems and potential areas for improvement.

  •       What are the national policy objectives/targets for investment?

  •       To what extent are these purely economic objectives and how far are they affected by social and political objectives?

  •       Which Ministry(ies)/agencies/other quasi-governmental bodies participate in the decision-making process?

  •       How much independence to sub-national layers of government (state, region, municipality etc.) have on investment issues?

  •       Is it a priority topic? Have any high-level government officials/politicians taken a particular interest in investment issues?

  •       To what extent have any recent policy changes been pushed by donors/intergovernmental organisations rather than domestic actors?

  •       Are civil society stakeholders involved/consulted in the policy-making process?

  TOP

Synthesis Report A

 

The report should seek to answer three key questions:

I.                     How successful have the countries in the study been in attracting FDI?

II.                   What are the policies that have influenced their level of success?

III.                  Can any general tentative policy recommendations be made on the basis of this?

1/ Short introduction to global production strategies: why might a MNC want to invest in a foreign country? Market/resource/efficiency-seeking. What are the latest insights into firms global strategies (e.g. are they less rational and more ad hoc than had earlier been thought?) [Nothing too technical] Broad macro characteristics of the project countries, presented in comparative graphs. Given the characteristics of our project countries, how much FDI would we expect them to attract? For what reasons?    

2/ Comparative success in attracting FDI

Do the countries meet these expectations?

Comparative graphs showing the FDI stock/flow for each of the countries; FDI as a share of GDP; as a share of world trade.

Some comparison with other countries in the region/world, e.g. China, E. and SE Asia, success stories in Africa, Argentina?

When differences in size, dynamism and outward orientation of the economies are held constant, are there still major differences in the amounts of FDI that these countries attract An attempt will be made to identify key drivers of FDI in each project nation. The report will also explore if the determinants are significant

3/ Role of FDI in the economy

Does FDI play a major role in these economies?

Comparative graphs of:

Proportion of FDI in domestic capital formation

FDI in the capital account (debt/aid/portfolio)

FDI flows as a proportion of changes in value added in the manufacturing sector?

Foreign-owned companies share in value addition; sales; employment; exports; concentration in particular sectors (as far as the information is available in the reports and annexes)

First conclusions on the overall importance of FDI in the economy.

4/ Place of FDI in the country’s economic policy.

Is it a particular focus?

Is there a distinct FDI policy or does it form part of a national investment policy? To what extent has FDI policy changed in recent years?

Very broadly, has liberalisation been correlated with a rise in FDI? Does the literature back the proposition that liberalisation leads to greater FDI flows?  

5/ What specific policies have been used by project countries? How do these compare to other investment regimes around the world? Including some consideration of policies other than FDI policy per se.

In this report, there will not be a detailed assessment of the effectiveness of policy; nor will there be an assessment of the impact of FDI on the economy. These will be reflected in Report B and the Report B synthesis.  

On the whole the report should be reader friendly, it should not be too technical. It must be comprehensible and interesting to laymen.

TOP


 

Terms of Reference

Report B: Investment Performance & Perception

Draft 03-02-02

 

Report B will seek to answer the following questions:

What impact has FDI had on the economy?

How successful have government policies been in attracting and benefiting from FDI?

What changes should be made to government policy in order to attract and benefit more from FDI?

Report B will contain:

 

1. A short introduction to FDI policy and performance in the country drawing on the research for Report A including   presentation and analysis of data on the sectoral distribution of FDI. This will serve to make the document complete and more readable for people who are not familiar with the subject matter. The introduction will also include a brief summary of the results from the civil society survey (see below) and an explanation of the selection of the case study sectors. 

2. Civil Society Survey

The questionnaire for the survey is attached as Annex 1. Partners will send out a postal and email survey, and may also distribute the survey, if possible, at NRG meeting 1. They should aim for 50 responses. Responses should be collated and shared with CUTS according to the following outline and attached as an annex to the report.

  1. Graph or chart showing responses to question [3?] on the sectors in which FDI is thought to have had the most impact. Top five answers. 

  2. Assessment of the overall impact of FDI using Q5
  3. Ways in which FDI is believed to have a positive impact using Q4&5
  4. Ways in which FDI is believed to have a negative impact using Q4&5

 

Copies of the filled questionnaires should be sent to CUTS separately as soon as they have all been collected. The main purpose of the survey is for researchers to get an idea of what the key concerns of civil society are and to help them in the selection of the case studies.

3. Three case studies: Three sectors will be selected for the research in consultation with CUTS. They will include    the power sector, telecoms and a manufacturing sector (auto industry). For African countries mining could be taken and textiles for Bangladesh. In countries where these sectors either do not exist or are of very minorimportance in relation to FDI, other sectors will be chosen in consultation with CUTS that share important features with these sectors.

For each case study, the report will present an economic and policy overview of the sector and the role of FDI in that sector. The research will be based on existing studies, economic data and a survey of foreign investors and domestic businesses in the selected sectors. Questionnaires are attached as Annexes 2 & 3 respectively.

The following information will be collected and presented for each sector:

         i   Sector data over time (10 years): sales, exports, total capital, working capital, employment, prices, (given inflation and exchange rate fluctuations), market concentration, average size of firms, the sectors' share in the GDP and total exports & imports.

        ii   FDI performance: stock, flows, approvals compared with fructification, nature of the FDI

       iii  Policy: FDI-specific policies incentives and regulations, sectoral regulations, IPR policy (if relevant).The implementation of policy is even more important than the letter of the policy. The role and effectiveness of the sectoral regulator, if appropriate.

       iv   Impact of FDI on the sector in terms of: competition and competitiveness of the sector, local business (competitors, suppliers, contractors etc), employment (including quality of work and remuneration), exports and capital flows, transfer of technology, know-how, skills and management expertise, environment

        v   Privatisation efforts in the sector: when started, how successful till date, how much FDI is allowed in the sector, the associated problems

 

On the basis of this data, the impact of FDI in the sector and the impact of policies will be analysed. The analysis will cover:

The differences between foreign firms and domestic firms in terms of performance (sales, profits, market share, employment) analysed over time. If foreign firms perform significantly different from domestic firms, explanations of why this is the case.

The impact of policies on the flow of FDI. Identification of those policies that have been most effective in attracting and retaining FDI in the sector and those policies that have discouraged investors. Is it possible to identify any policy changes which have had a significant impact on the amount of FDI in the sector?

The relevance of policies on the impact of FDI on the sector. In particular, the analysis will assess whether policies have increased the benefits of FDI in terms the aspects of FDI in (iv) above, whether policies have been implemented effectively and whether they have had the intended effects.

4. Conclusion. On the basis of the case studies and all the survey results as well as secondary sources and other economic data, the Report will generate concrete recommendations for government policies at the sectoral level. These should be presented in a clear, bulleted format. Looking forward, are any policy changes under onsideration? Should policy be tailored to the sector or are there useful policy steps that the government could take to maximise the benefits of FDI across the board? The analysis should consider, in particular, the relevance of corporate governance regulations, capital market regulation, competition policy, labour and environmental laws etc as well as FDI promotion and facilitation initiatives. In all cases, the analysis should consider how implementation of existing policies can improved and the prospects for successful implementation of proposed  policies. 

TOP

Annex I

Questionnaire for Civil Society 

1

Do you think that on the whole, FDI has contributed to national economic development objectives in the past…

Please circle the correct answer

   

a

…2 years?

Yes

No

 

b

…5 years?

Yes

No

 

c

…10 years?

Yes

No

 

2

Which sectors do you think have received the largest amount of FDI in the last 5 years?

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

2

 

 

3

3

In which sectors do you feel that FDI has had the greatest impact on the local economy ,  society and the environment etc.?

Please rank them in order of greatest overall impact

 

 

1

 

 

2

 

 

3

4.

 

In the three sectors mentioned above, what has been the impact of FDI on the following parameters? 

Strong positive impact = 1

Weak positive impact = 2

Little or no impact = 3

Weak negative impact = 4

Strong negative impact = 5

 

 

Sector 1

Sector 2

Sector 3

a

Quantity of jobs

 

 

 

b

Quality of jobs

 

 

 

c

Availability of new technologies

 

 

 

d

Competition in markets

 

 

 

e

Opportunities for domestic businesses

 

 

 

f

Quality of products available to consumers

 

 

 

g

Prices of products for consumers

 

 

 

h

Choice of products available to consumers

 

 

 

i

Balance of payments of the country

 

 

 

j

Physical Environment

 

 

 

k

Demonstration of better technologies to local firms

 

 

 

l

Learning and technology upgradation by local firms

 

 

 

m

Revenue for the government

 

 

 

5.

Based on the experience of your country over the last decade or so, do you agree or disagree with the following statements?

 

 

Agree strongly = 1

Agree partly = 2

Neither agree nor disagree = 3

Disagree partly = 4

Disagree strongly = 5

 

 

Please circle the correct answer

a

FDI brings in valuable new technologies.

1

2

3

4

5

b

FDI brings in environmentally harmful technologies.

1

2

3

4

5

c

FDI brings in valuable new management techniques.

1

2

3

4

5

d

FDI improves the competitiveness of the national economy.

1

2

3

4

5

e

FDI increases access to world markets.

1

2

3

4

5

f

Foreign investors are only interested in getting access to the domestic market.

1

2

3

4

5

g

FDI makes up for insufficient domestic investment.

1

2

3

4

5

h

FDI reduces the profitable opportunities available to domestic investors.

1

2

3

4

5

i

FDI results out of unfair advantages of multinational firms.

1

2

3

4

5

j

FDI is a valuable source of foreign capital

1

2

3

4

5

k

FDI helps to enhance exports.

1

2

3

4

5

l

FDI helps to reduce imports.

1

2

3

4

5

m

Foreign investors do not care about the impact of their investments on civil society.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Do you think that your country attracts less foreign investment than it should?

Please circle the correct answer

 

 

Yes

No

Don’t know

B

What do you think the main reasons for the above?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

In case your country attracts “less FDI than it should", which policies do you think the government should change (or have) in order to attract more FDI?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

Should certain sectors be banned from FDI?

Yes

No

Don’t know

B

If ‘Yes,’ which sectors ought to be banned?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

Should certain sectors be specifically targeted for FDI?

Yes

No

Don’t know

B

If ‘Yes,’ which sectors ought to be targeted?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

Do you think that FDI policy needs to change?

Please circle the correct answer

 

No change

More restrictive or less liberal

Less restrictive or more liberal

11

Do you think that the policies of your country could influence the nature of the impact and influence of FDI on the local economy and society?            

Yes

No

Don’t know

12

Which policies should the government use to increase the benefits from FDI?

 

 

 

a

Support local businesses to upgrade technology/gain access to finance etc

Yes

No

Don’t know

b

Strengthen environmental regulation

Yes

No

Don’t know

c

Introduce/strengthen competition policy

Yes

No

Don’t know

d

Strengthen sectoral regulation

Yes

No

Don’t know

e

Strengthen labour legislation

Yes

No

Don’t know

f

Strengthen intellectual property rights legislation

Yes

No

Don’t know

g

Impose requirements on foreign firms to:

Yes

No

Don’t know

i

Create jobs?

Yes

No

Don’t know

ii

Employ local managers?

Yes

No

Don’t know

iii

Transfer technology?

Yes

No

Don’t know

iv

Source supplies from local firms or impose local content norms?

Yes

No

Don’t know

v

Export from the economy?

Yes

No

Don’t know

vi

Balance foreign exchange impact?

Yes

No

Don’t know

vii

Transfer skills and know-how to local subsidiary firms?

Yes

No

Don’t know

vii

Transfer skills and know-how to local non-affiliate firms?

Yes

No

Don’t know

ix

Train local technical and managerial manpower?

Yes

No

Don’t know

13

Do you believe there are options other than imposed requirements to influence the behaviour of foreign firms for the benefit of the economy?

Yes

No

Don’t know

b

If yes, what are these other options and how would they work?

 

 

 

                                 

TOP

Annex II

Questionnaire for local businesses  

 

1

Company information [Note: this information should be collected from the company’s annual accounts where possible]

a

Year of establishment

 

b

Sales

 

c

Turnover

 

d

Profits

 

e

Number employed

 

2

Are the company's shares traded in the local share market?

Yes

No

3

What are the enterprise’s leading products or services?

(Up to 3)

 

1

 

 

2

 

 

3

 

4

For each leading product

 

 

 

Are main competitors foreign or domestic?

When did the MNC enter the market?

Current market share in the domestic market

 

Product 1

 

 

 

 

Product 2

 

 

 

 

Product 3

 

 

 

5

For each leading product, please state the proportion of total sales

 

 

Exports

MNCs

Domestically owned firms

State-owned firms

 

Product 1

 

 

 

 

 

Product 2

 

 

 

 

 

Product 3

 

 

 

 

6

What has the impact been on the firm of MNC presence?

a

Sales

Increased

Decreased

No impact

b

Employment

Increased

Decreased

No impact

c

Competition

Increased

Decreased

No impact

d

Available technologies

Increased

Decreased

No impact

e

Know-how including shop floor practices

Increased

Decreased

No impact

f

Product quality/precision

Improved

Declined

No impact

g

Access to foreign markets

Improved

Declined

No impact

h

Management techniques

 

 

 

i

Availability of skilled labour to the firm

Increased

Decreased

No impact

j

Cost of skilled labour to the firm

Increased

Decreased

No impact

k

Other

 

 

 

7

Do you actively try to learn from the MNCs operating in the local economy?

Yes

No

b

If yes, what forms does this learning efforts take?

 

 

8

In product lines where your firm competes with MNCs, how have MNCs been able to capture market share?

a

Product quality

b

Product price

c

Brand awareness

d

Other

9

Do the following factors make MNCs more competitive than domestic firms?

a

Lower cost of capital

Yes

No

b

Part of a global production network

Yes

No

c

Ability to get equipment on credit from international suppliers

Yes

No

d

Preferential treatment by the government

Yes

No

10

Do you think that on the whole, FDI has contributed to national economic development objectives in the past…

a

…2 years?

Yes

No

b

…5 years?

Yes

No

c

…10 years?

Yes

No

11

Do you think that your country attracts less foreign investment than it should?

Please circle the correct answer

 

 

Yes

No

Don’t know

b

What do you think the main reasons for the above?

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

12

In case your country attracts “less FDI than it should", which  policies do you think the government should change (or have) in order to attract more FDI?

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

Should certain sectors be banned from FDI?

Yes

No

Don’t know

b

If ‘Yes,’ which sectors ought to be banned?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14

Should certain sectors be specifically targeted for FDI?

Yes

No

Don’t know

b

If ‘Yes,’ which sectors ought to be targeted?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

Do you think that FDI policy needs to change?

Please circle the correct answer

 

No change

More restrictive or less liberal

Less restrictive or more liberal

16

Do you think that the policies of your country could influence the nature of the impact and influence of FDI on the local economy and society?            

Yes

No

Don’t know

17

Which policies should the government use to increase the benefits from FDI?

 

 

 

a

Support local businesses to upgrade technology/gain access to finance etc

Yes

No

Don’t know

b

Strengthen environmental regulation

Yes

No

Don’t know

c

Introduce/strengthen competition policy

Yes

No

Don’t know

d

Strengthen sectoral regulation

Yes

No

Don’t know

e

Strengthen labour legislation

Yes

No

Don’t know

f

Strengthen intellectual property rights legislation

Yes

No

Don’t know

g

Impose requirements on foreign firms to:

Yes

No

Don’t know

i

Create jobs?

Yes

No

Don’t know

ii

Employ local managers?

Yes

No

Don’t know

iii

Transfer technology?

Yes

No

Don’t know

iv

Source supplies from local firms or impose local content norms?

Yes

No

Don’t know

v

Export from the economy?

Yes

No

Don’t know

vi

Balance foreign exchange impact?

Yes

No

Don’t know

vii

Transfer skills and know-how to local subsidiary firms?

Yes

No

Don’t know

vii

Transfer skills and know-how to local non-affiliate firms?

Yes

No

Don’t know

ix

Train local technical and managerial manpower?

Yes

No

Don’t know

18

Do you believe there are options other than imposed requirements to influence the behaviour of foreign firms for the benefit of the economy?

Yes

No

Don’t know

b

If yes, what are these other options and how would they work?

 

 

 

                                     

TOP

Annex III

Investors Questionnaire for the Foreign Subsidiary

 

[For each firm, the following information should be collected from the annual accounts, historical accounts and any other public sources available before conducting the interview.]

 

Year of establishment

Sales

Turnover

Profits

Number employed

Are the company's shares traded in the local share market/a foreign share market?

 

Share holdings

 

%

foreign partner/parent

 

foreign other firms

 

mutual funds

 

portfolio funds

 

financial institutions - multilateral

 

Public sector

 

domestic investors

 

 

Sources of financing

secured/unsecured loans

 

external commercial borrowings

 

IFC/ADB

 

domestic market debt

 

foreign market debt

 

Retained profits

 

 

Details of the Board of Directors and its Composition

 

[Clarify any of the above with the local manager in the interview]

 

Interview questions

1. What are your enterprise’s leading products or services? (Up to 3)

1.___________________2. ___________________ 3. ___________________

 

 

2. What are the leading products or services of your enterprise’s parent company?

1.___________________2. ___________________ 3. ___________________

 

For these product lines please provide the following information

 

Main competitors (foreign or domestic)

Status of competition (High/Medium/ Low)

Has the competition in this product become fiercer in recent years? (Yes/No)

Market share in the relevant domestic market

Ratio of domestic sales to exports

Product 1

 

 

 

 

 

Product 2

 

 

 

 

 

Product 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

How would you describe the initial investment and the most recent round of investment: (if there has been more than one round of investments). [Note: For each round more than one option is possible and therefore multiple responses are valid]

 

Initial (Yes/No)

Most recent (Yes/No)

Joint venture

 

 

Greenfield investment

 

 

Merger/acquisition of existing business by investing firm

 

 

Brownfield investment (acquisition of existing assets that were not in productive use)

 

 

 

 

Where are major management decisions concerning the enterprise made? [Note: For each round more than one option is possible and therefore multiple responses are valid]

 

Decision

At the international level (parent firm)

At the regional level (parent firm)

At the national level

(local firm)

Pricing of output

 

 

 

Product/Design choice

 

 

 

Technologies to be transferred

 

 

 

Product to be developed

 

 

 

Product market choice

 

 

 

Marketing strategy/design

 

 

 

Sourcing of inputs

 

 

 

Transfer Pricing

 

 

 

Product offerings

 

 

 

Staffing of senior managers

 

 

 

Advertising content/design

 

 

 

Promotional strategy

 

 

 

Organisational Structure

 

 

 

Rewards & incentives for senior managers

 

 

 

Shop floor layout

 

 

 

 What targets have been set and met for the investment and over what time period?

 

Target Set

Target Met? Yes/No

Time period

Market share

 

 

 

Return on capital

 

 

 

Exports

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

EXPORTS

Export sales

Exports as % of total sales

Exports to:

% total exports

North America

 

Europe

 

Developing countries

 

Countries in the same region

 

 

SALES

Destination of sales:   

                       

% total sales

To other affiliates

 

Local state agencies or enterprises

 

Local market/firms                   

 

Others                                     

 

 

 

Technology payments (royalties, technical fees, managerial fees etc. over the last 3-5 years)

R&D expenditures over the last 3-5 years

 

LABOUR

Has employment gone up or down since the initial foreign investment?

 

What proportion of managers was hired domestically?

 

Are employees unionised? What %?

 

How do wages compare with the national average?

Below               Same                Above

 

How would you characterise relations with employees?

Harmonious            Mixed               Strained

 

Are the government’s regulations for labour:

Clear? Yes/No

Excessive i.e. they slow restructuring or lower the productivity of the firm? Yes/No

Any particular regulation?

 

Does the implementation of the policy differ from the stated policy? In what ways?

 

Are regulations applied equally to foreign and domestic firms?

 

Are the labour laws more stringent here than

            In the home country?                                                  Yes/No

            Other host countries you have worked in?                    Yes/No

 

ENVIRONMENT

Did the government require an environmental impact assessment before the investment was approved?

 

Who undertook the EIA? Who paid for it? Did the results require the project to be modified? In what ways?

 

Are the government’s environmental regulations:

Clear? Yes/No

Excessive i.e. they slow restructuring or lower the productivity of the firm? Yes/No

Is there any one regulation that is particularly problematic?

 

Does the implementation of the policy differ from the stated policy? In what ways?

 

Are regulations applied equally to foreign and domestic firms?

 

CROSS BORDER TRANSACTIONS

Does the government impose any regulations on:

a.       Local content

b.       Export balancing

c.       Level of imports

d.       Level of exports

e.       Transfer of dividends

f.        Limits on access to foreign exchange

g.       Payment of royalties/technical fees

h.       Other foreign exchange transactions

 

Do any of these pose significant problems for the firm?

 

INTERACTION WITH LOCAL FIRMS

Does the enterprise subcontract activities to local firms? Yes/No

Which activities? E.g. Production, distribution, marketing etc.(Please list all)

 

What are the sources of your inputs? What proportion (%) of inputs comes from local firms?

Input

Local unaffiliated firms

Local affiliated firms

Affiliates elsewhere

Other imports

Raw material

 

 

 

 

Components

 

 

 

 

Others

 

 

 

 

 

Has the proportion of inputs procured from local firms risen over time?             Yes/No

Is there a target for increasing/decreasing dependence on domestic suppliers?

 

If you buy from local firms, what type of relationship do you have with them?

Relationship

Local unaffiliated firms

Local affiliated firms

Subcontracting/contract production

Yes/No

Yes/No

OEM

Yes/No

Yes/No

Others (Specify)

Yes/No

Yes/No

 

 

What are the reasons for sourcing from domestic suppliers?

Low prices/High quality/Other ____________

 

Has the firm engaged in any efforts to raise quality/productivity of local suppliers by…

a. Providing information about standards?                                            Yes/No

b. Providing access to advanced measuring and other tools?                   Yes/No

c. Training programmes?                                                                Yes/No

Other: _________________________

 

Does the enterprise licence out any technologies to local firms?

 

MARKETING

Does the enterprise use an international brand for its domestic sales?                                     Yes/No

How much do you spend on advertising as a proportion to sales?                                       %

How much do you spend on other marketing expenses as a proportion to sales?               %

 

 

Has the enterprise acquired any local brands?                                                                 Yes/No

 

INVESTMENT EXPERIENCE

Does the firm have any plans to increase its investment?                                                       Yes/No

If yes, why?

__________________________________________

 

If no, does the firm have any plans to reduce its investment in the country?                  Yes/No

If yes, why?

__________________________________________

 

What have the greatest problems been in establishing or expanding the business in this country? [There should be no answer prompt for this question]

a.       Administrative requirements including bureaucratic hassles (anything in particular?)

b.       Corruption

c.       Inadequate legal protection

d.       Inadequate security

e.       Finding skilled labour

f.        Getting access to inputs

g.       Getting access to adequate sources of power, communications and transport

h.       Well established local competitors (Was this competition based on a brand?)

i.         Tax levels

j.         Political uncertainty

k.       Unsatisfactory relations with home country government

l.         Inadequate protection of IPRs

m.     Demand, small/stagnant market

n.       Not enough tariff protection

o.       Competition from imports

p.       Lack of policy/regulatory clarity in the specific industry

q.       Imposition of certain requirements

r.         Other

 

What have the greatest problems been in operating the firm? [There should be no answer prompt for this question]

a.       Administrative requirements (anything in particular?)

b.       Corruption

c.       Inadequate legal protection (courts)

d.       Inadequate security

e.       Poor access to finance

f.        Quality of labour force

g.       Quality of suppliers

h.       Quality of local services

i.         Poor infrastructure (which sector? communications/power/transport)

j.         Limited markets

k.       Tax levels/changes in the system of taxation

l.         Political uncertainty

m.     Unsatisfactory relations with home country government

n.       Inadequate protection of IPRs

o.       Demand, small/stagnant market

p.       Not enough tariff protection

q.       Competition from imports

r.        Lack of policy/regulatory clarity in the specific industry

s.       Imposition of certain requirements

t.        Other

 

Is the firm subject to any political or bureaucratic interference in its operations and management decisions? How often? In what areas?

 

Was information about the laws and regulations for approval easy to obtain?

 

Did the implementation of laws and regulations differ from the information that was provided?

 

If you have made any investment in the past three years, how long did it take to get the investment approved by the investment board?

 

Was there any political involvement in the process?

 

What further approvals were necessary? From…

a.       Planning/real estate regulators

b.       Local Government

c.       Sectoral Ministries? Which? _________________

d.       Environmental Ministry (for environment clearance)

e.       Other Government Ministries? Which? _________________

f.        Overall, how many agencies did you have to deal with?

g.       Are approvals mere formalities or are seriously undertaken?

 

Did the firm receive assistance in the post-establishment period from the investment agency or any other sources? Was this helpful?

 

Which policies should the government priorities in order to improve the investment environment? [Note: There should be no answer prompt for this question]

a.       Change FDI policy e.g. by reducing investment caps/bans; abolish TRIMS/other requirements for foreign investors; increase incentives

b.       Change other regulatory policies e.g. labour/environment/sectoral/competition regulations

c.       Liberalise capital markets

d.       Liberalise the trade regime

e.       Reduce tax rates

f.        Rationalise the tax system

g.       Invest in health

h.       Invest in education/training

i.         Improve infrastructure

j.         Improve the capabilities of domestic firms

k.       Rationalise approval procedures

 

Did the enterprise receive any investment incentives when the investment was made? Were these incentives discretionary or available to all investors?

Do they still apply?

 

INTERACTION WITH CIVIL SOCIETY

In general, do you feel that civil society (consumer, unions, chambers of commerce, media, academia etc.) in the country are positively disposed toward foreign investors?

 

Have you encountered any organised resistance from civil society to the company’s activities? Which groups:

a.       Trade unions

b.       Environmental campaigners/non-governmental organisations

c.       Consumer groups

d.       Local business groups/chamber of commerce etc.

e.       Media

f.        Academia

What was the nature of the dispute?

Has the dispute been resolved?

How was it resolved?

 

What contribution has the enterprise made to national economic development?

In the future, what contribution do you think that the company will make to national economic development?

TOP

Terms of Reference

Report C

17-05-02

 

Note : The specifications for the report has to be modified from those given in the Operational Strategy Note (OSN). In the OSN, the report covers only the second NRG. However, as all the NRG meetings would have important and useful outputs for the report, the report would be more valuable if it covers all of the three NRG meetings that are held in each country rather than covering one meeting exclusively. 

The report would therefore be due 6 weeks after the third NRG meeting has been held, i.e. in October-November 2002.

Purpose: The purpose of the report is for distribution as a policy advocacy document at the national level. The report should therefore be written in a readily accessible style, with attention given to the presentation as well as the language. Reports A (FDI policy report) and B  (FDI performance and perceptions report) would act as base for report C.

Report A and B of each country will be published together as a FDI policy, performance and perceptions report. Report C will be published as a National Advocacy document.

Contents: The introductory chapter of the report would contain an overview of FDI policies drawing from report A. It would also summarise FDI performance and perceptions of civil society and investors drawing from Report B.

The report would have a list of actions including legislative changes but with emphasis on implementation to be taken by:

  1. Government (national, state, regional or local, government agencies, quasi-governmental bodies etc)

  2. Civil society (including business associations and other groups representing business, trade unions and other representatives of labour, consumer groups, environmental groups, the media etc.)

  3. Intergovernmental organizations and multilateral institutions, if relevant

Actions should be grouped into categories, for example, by responsible department or agency, or by relevant piece of legislation. The list of actions should be generated on the basis of:

  1. The research and analysis undertaken by the partner

  2. Discussions in the NRG meetings: the agenda of NRG meetings and the format for discussions at the meetings should generate concrete recommendations, for example by active chairing of sessions or designating a ‘facilitator.’ Partners may wish to take votes/polls either in oral or written form to back up claims of support.

The partner might formulate recommendations and place them up for discussion by stakeholders at the NRG meetings. These could be drafted and discussed in NRG 3.

There will be a range of views represented at the NRG meetings. Universal endorsement for the actions may not be necessary from the NRG meetings. The outcomes of partners’ research could get relatively more importance than opinions voiced at the meeting. However reasoned dissent should be noted.

It will enhance the utility of the document for advocacy purposes if some recommendations have broad backing in the meeting. This support and the opinions of key figures in the NRG who supported particular propositions could be noted in the document. Quotations from interventions by eminent individuals would be useful and could be used where possible.

For all the actions, clear explanations of key terms and concepts could be provided for clear understanding. In the interim project meeting scheduled for October 2002 and the partners could decide how they could work together and with CUTS in elucidating key terms and concepts. Each of the advocacy points should have proper justification. This may draw on the Report A and Report B research, on experience and examples of good practice in IFD countries or elsewhere in the world and the discussions at NRG meetings.

Format: The report will contain the following chapters:

  •      Introduction: The IFD project; purpose of forming an NRG; constitution of NRG.

  •      Chapter I: Investment policy, performance and perceptions in the country. This chapter will act as the background chapter for the rest of the report. It will draw from the first two country reports.  (reports A&B).The chapter will be very brief

  •      Chapter II: Discussions in the three NRGs. This chapter will not be arranged meeting - session- or speaker-wise. It will be arranged according to different issues discussed e.g. domestic investment policy, FDI performance, perceptions of FDI, behaviour of TNCs, regional and international investment issues.

  •      Chapter III: List of actions/recommendations for Government

  •      Chapter IV: List of actions/recommendations for Civil Society

  •      Chapter V: List of actions/recommendations for IGOs

  •      Chapter VI: Conclusion

  •      Annexures:

1.         Full list of all identified NRG members contacted

2.         Full list of participants for each of the three events

3.         Agenda for the 3 events

4.         Three separate reports for the three events. The report should summarize the presentations &
    
discussions of the events. Each report should be 3000-5000 words long.


CONTACT US
CUTS Centre For International Trade, Economics & Environment (CITEE)

D–217,  Bhaskar Marg,  Bani  Park, 

Jaipur  302 016,  India,

Ph: +91(0)141-228 2821

Fax: 91.141.2282485  

Email: cuts@cuts.org   

About Project

Event Reports

Papers and PowerPoint Presentations

Country Reports

Publications

 Home


Copyright 2005 Consumer Unity & Trust Society (CUTS), All rights reserved.
D-217, Bhaskar Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur 302 016, India
Ph: 91.141.2282821, Fax: 91.141.2282485

 

Hosted by: www.fullestop.com

Top