Campaign on Linkages
| CUTS>CITEE>Campaign on Linkages >Analysis |
| Home About CUTS CITEE CART CHD C-SPAC CUTS-ARC Contact CUTS |
|
|
Campaign on Linkages |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
US
Toolbox on Labour: A critical analysis
United States of America has proposed
an illustrative list*,
which identifies a ‘toolbox’ of actions it could take in combination
with trade negotiations to promote the protection of children, adherence
to core labour standards, and mutually supportive trade and environmental
protection policies. Reviewing
this ‘illustrative’ list, it appears to be an attempt to incorporate
social clause (labour standards) and environmental clause (standards) into
the agenda of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). On the other hand, many
developing countries are opposing the inclusion of such an agenda into the
WTO, stating that by incorporating these standards into the WTO is an
attempt by the US to create protectionist policies. Though
some developing countries have signed bilateral trade agreements
independently with the US, which have provisions of linking trade with
labour and environmental standards. It
is necessary to understand the fast changing US domestic political
scenario in order to get a clear sense of the issues on this list. Since
trade issues are increasingly penetrating the public domain, US
politicians have more to gain and lose domestically from how US trade
initiatives affect their local constituents.
At
the centre of the debate is the issue of “fair trade”. In a letter to
President George W. Bush Jr., 61 Senators stated that US trade laws such
as the anti-dumping law, countervailing duty law, Section 201, and Section
301 are critical for supporting global “fair trade”. Many developing
countries see these “fair trade” laws as protectionist policies
towards “free trade” for America. In fact, the day Democrats took
control of the Senate, they offered to support granting the admission with
the Trade Promotion Authority if the Bush administration moved forward
with the US-Jordan and US-Vietnam Free Trade Areas, maintained US import
laws and agreed to a flexible ‘toolbox’ approach to including labour
and environmental standards in US trade policy initiatives.
This overview is an attempt to provide a
critical analysis of the US ‘toolbox’ on labour and provide
alternatives to linking trade with labour standards and non-sanctions
based ways of adhering to core labour standards. It is clear that
different countries in this world are at different levels of development
and thus, applying the same standards to all countries may not reverse the
trend of a lop-sided world economic development. Not
only is there a lack of understanding about the links between trade and
non-trade issues on the part of many civil society groups and trade
unions, there seems to be no concerted effort in organising dialogue to
discuss these issues. Thus, it’s a part of CUTS’ initiative on
capacity building on linkages between trade and non-trade issues. Dialogue
amongst concerned groups is necessary to address the issues in an unbiased
manner to search for the solutions to the problems by evolving a roadmap
through consensus rather than creating roadblocks.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CUTS
Centre For International Trade, Economics
& Environment (CITEE)
D–217, Bhaskar Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur 302 016, India, Ph:
+91(0)141-228 2821-3 Fx: +91(0)141-228 2485 Email: cuts@cuts.org |
D-217, Bhaskar Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur 302 016, India Ph: 91.141.2282821, Fax: 91.141.2282485
Hosted by: www.fullestop.com |