Services
Communication from Columbia
WORLD TRADE
ORGANIZATION
RESTRICTED
S/WPDR/W/29
7 July 2004
(04-2920)
Working Party on Domestic Regulation
Original: Spanish
COMMUNICATION FROM COLOMBIA
Examples of Measures Relating to Administrative Procedures
for Obtaining Visas or Entry Permits
The following communication from
the delegation of Colombia, dated 5 July 2004, is
being circulated to members of the Working Party on
Domestic Regulation.
_______________
I. GENERAL
1. The private sector in Colombia
has identified administrative measures relating to
procedures for obtaining and renewing visas or entry
permits as the main obstacle to trade. The surveys
conducted by the public and private sectors lead to
the conclusion that most of these measures make it
difficult, or indeed impossible, for Colombian enterprises
to compete in international markets, and therefore
constitute barriers to trade. This directly affects
trade in services supplied through the four modes
recognized under the GATS.
2. Various studies show that administrative
procedures relating to migration affect any trade
that requires the movement of natural persons from
one territory to another. The type of persons affected
in Colombia include, inter alia: (i) business visitors
who need to travel frequently to make or monitor their
investments, persons involved in pre- and post-sales
services, persons travelling to trade fairs and business
meetings; (ii) intra-corporate transferees, such as
auditors, lawyers, and support staff needed to deal
with matters relating to employees linked to Colombian
enterprises located abroad, technical assistance for
maintenance and repair of machinery, trainees; (iii)
contract suppliers and independent professionals offering
professional and technical services in the areas of
engineering, architecture, auditing, advertising,
consulting, etc. Singers, painters, writers and sportsmen
and sportswomen supplying recreational, cultural and
sporting services have also been affected.
3. In recent discussions on the subject
of trade and migration1 and negotiating proposals
submitted to the Special Session of the Council for
Trade in Services, it has been recognized that administrative
measures relating to procedures for obtaining visas
or entry permits for natural persons providing services
constitute one of the main obstacles and undermine
the value of existing commitments. These proposals
mention that the problem has a variety of sources,
such as procedural delays, the complexity of the formalities,
high costs, lack of transparency, etc. Matters are
made worse by excessive discretionality and the failure
of migration policies to draw a clear distinction
between temporary movement and permanent immigration.
4. In many cases, we are dealing
with regulatory issues that can be tackled through
different approaches. Certain Members have suggested
different alternatives2 for finding effective solutions
to the problem, the aim being to ensure that the commitments
of Members in the area of market access are not rendered
meaningless by the existence of procedures that are
lacking in objective criteria and transparency and
that are more burdensome than necessary.
5. In order to stimulate discussions
relating to administrative procedures, we have provided,
in Section II below, a series of examples of regulatory
measures relating to the procedures for processing
and obtaining visas or entry permits for service suppliers.
II. EXAMPLES OF MEASURES RELATING
TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES IN CONNECTION WITH VISA
APPLICATIONS AND THE FORMALITIES FOR OBTAINING VISAS
OR ENTRY PERMITS
6. What follows is a series of examples
of administrative measures imposed by the immigration
authorities for the issuance of visas or entry permits.
These examples are the result of a detailed study
of cases provided by Colombian companies and service
suppliers that face formalities of this kind on a
daily basis, incur considerable expense, and confront
obstacles which often make their business impossible.
The examples cover such elements as visa processing
time, application fees, documents, requirements and
conditions for visa application, publication of formalities,
etc.
7. To facilitate discussion, the
examples are grouped together as follows:
* Application requirements and procedures
* Necessary documentation
* Processing time and length of stay
* Application fees
* Administration
8. Application requirements and procedures:
* Applications must be submitted
personally.
* A prior appointment is required. Appointments are
granted up to eight months following the submission
of the application.
* Once the application has been received, a personal
interview is required before a reply can be given.
* Visas are processed in the capital only.
* The passport is retained during processing (in some
cases, passports remain up to two months in the Consulate).
This requirement prevents the applicant from going
on other business trips.
* Visas will only be granted/renewed if the applicant
has visas from other countries.
9. Necessary documentation:
* Each visa application requires,
inter alia, an employment certificate, a copy of the
salary statement, bank statements, police record,
educational certificates and qualifications, etc.
Originals of the documents must be presented.
* Applicants must provide hotel reservations and original
air tickets. Obtaining the originals of these documents
means paying for them without any certainty that the
visa will be granted.
* There is a lack of transparency in the publication
of the documentation required and relevant information.
* The documents and procedures for renewing a visa
are the same as those for obtaining a visa for the
first time.
10. Processing time and length of stay:
* The processing time is excessively
long. It can take up to three months to receive a
reply once the papers have been submitted. In cases
requiring a prior appointment, it can take even longer
- up to one year.
* Authorized length of stay is very limited (one month).
* No multiple visas are granted.
11. Application fees:
* Visa application fees are high,
perhaps higher than the approximate value of the services
rendered. The applicant pays the equivalent of up
to US$160 for each application, an amount which is
not refunded if the visa is denied.
* Given the complexity of the process, the applicant
will inevitably have to pay additional costs, such
as travel to the capital, hotel reservations, etc.
12. Administration:
* Absence of pre-established procedures
and lack of predictability in the administration of
procedures.
* Lack of transparency in the procedures for obtaining
visas or entry permits.
III. GATS PROVISIONS RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
13. In examining the above examples,
it might be useful to take account of certain provisions
of the GATS in order to help focus our discussions
and find effective solutions to the problems.
* Colombia recognizes and attaches
great importance to the right of Members to regulate
and to introduce new regulations on the supply of
services within their territories in order to meet
national policy objectives.
* Nevertheless, there are specific cases in which,
though the intentions may be legitimate, regulations
could be applied in such a way as to undermine the
commitments that have been negotiated. Consequently,
the various elements of Article VI of the GATS are
important to this analysis. On the one hand, paragraph
1 seeks the full implementation of the commitments
assumed and stipulates that Members shall ensure that
all measures of general application affecting trade
in services are administered in a reasonable, objective
and impartial manner. At the same time, paragraph
4 is intended to address the trade-restrictiveness
and burdensome nature of measures to ensure that they
do not become unnecessary barriers to trade in services
and undermine the liberalization of trade in services
undertaken by Members.
* The Annex on Movement of Natural Persons Supplying
Services under the Agreement contains elements which
clarify and supplement the provisions of the Agreement
as regards the scope of services supplied under Mode
4. Colombia does not question the full right of governments
to regulate the entry or temporary stay of natural
persons in their territory and the exclusion from
the scope of the Agreement of any measure that affects
the permanent access of persons to the labour market.
However, with respect to measures of a temporary nature,
the Annex establishes, among others, one fundamental
element that is relevant to our discussions, namely
the limitation of the regulatory capacity of governments
to apply measures which in no case nullify or impair
the benefits accruing to any Member.
14. Colombia is not questioning the actual fact of
requiring a visa. Its main concern revolves around
the administrative procedures involved in applying
for and obtaining a visa or entry permit, to the extent
that they constitute trade barriers which could nullify
or impair the benefits accruing to a Member.
IV. CONCLUSIONS AND ISSUES TO BE
CONSIDERED IN THE FUTURE
15. The above considerations lead
to the conclusion that the introduction of burdensome
administrative measures can result in trade barriers
that prevent service suppliers from handling, in a
prompt and efficient manner, offers and business trips
abroad. This, in its turn, leads to loss of business
and a consequent decrease in trade in services.
16. The WTO services negotiations
provide us with the opportunity to address certain
substantive and procedural issues in this connection.
This is why Colombia has tabled negotiating proposals
in the framework of the ongoing negotiations, and
in specific requests to its trading partners3, has
stressed the need to find effective solutions aimed
at facilitating trade in services and ensuring the
full implementation of specific commitments made.
17. In the case of goods, the multilateral
system has recognized the need to establish disciplines
to facilitate the flow of products. Thus, Articles
V, VIII and X of the GATT lay down a set of legal
rules aimed at streamlining procedures and minimising
the costs associated with exports and imports of goods.
As regards services, the GATS establishes a number
of important principles, for example Article III,
IV, VI and XVIII and the Annex on Natural Persons
Supplying Services Under the Agreement, which should
be taken into consideration in these discussions.
Other WTO agreements probably also address issues
that could be relevant to these discussions.
18. In order to contribute to the
debate regarding the development of disciplines under
Article VI:4, we have provided below a series of questions
aimed at stimulating and focusing our discussions:
(a) Is there a relationship between
the administrative procedures pertaining to visas
and possible disciplines under Article VI:4?
(b) Which of the above examples could
be described as measures covered by Article VI:4,
and which could be covered by Articles XVI and XVII
of the GATS? Which of these measures could be classified
as measures of the two types?
(c) According to a Secretariat document,
licensing procedures are "administrative procedures
relating to the submission and processing of an application
for a licence, covering such matters as time-frames
for the processing of a licence, and the number of
documents and the amount of information required in
the application for a licence".4 Bearing this
in mind, do Members consider that visa procedures
could be covered by this definition?
(d) If not, do Members consider that
they could be covered by any other item in Article
VI:4, for example qualification procedures?
(e) Are there any other GATS provisions
that could cover visa procedures? Perhaps Articles
III, VI:1, VI:5 or VI:6?
(f) Certain Members may consider
that some of these measures are not covered by Article
VI:4, by Articles XVI and XVII, or indeed by other
GATS provisions. If so, and bearing in mind that certain
measures constitute restrictions on trade, would it
not be useful to exchange views as to where it would
be most appropriate to address them?
(g) Lastly, we must ask ourselves
whether it is possible to develop less burdensome
but equally effective regulations in order to attain
the objective that has been set.
__________
1 Symposium on the Movement of Natural
Persons (Mode 4) under the GATS, 11 and 12 April 2002;
Expert Meeting on Mode 4, UNCTAD, 29-31 July 2003;
Seminar on Trade and Migration organized by the OECD,
the IOM and the World Bank, 12-14 November 2003.
2 Communication from India (S/CSS/W/12)
of 24 November 2000; Communication from a group of
developing countries (TN/S/W/14); Review of Progress
as Established in Paragraph 15 of the Guidelines and
Procedures for Negotiations on Trade in Services (TN/S/W/19).
3 Communication from a group of developing
countries, TN/S/W/14, of 3 July 2003; specific requests
submitted to 13 of Colombia's trading partners.
4 Note by the Secretariat, document
S/WPPS/W/9 of 11 September 1996.
|